Article

Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Social Science Data

Bruce Kogut

in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis

Published in print April 2010 | ISBN: 9780199233762
Published online May 2010 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199233762.003.0007

Series: Oxford Handbooks in Business and Management

 Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Social Science Data

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Business and Management
  • Research Methods

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

This article explores two topics: comparative methods and methodological responses to contingent ‘truth’ claims of social science. The objective of comparative research is, by this approach, to investigate truth claims across a subset of all possible worlds. For many researchers in the field of comparative social science, these worlds are inhabited by nation-states, but they could be, of course, any type of organization or collective. The kind of truth claim that interests researchers of the study of comparative institutions is the identification of those institutions whose efficacy is universalistic or specific to a country. The objective of comparative research to investigate the domain and validity of a truth claim faces at least four challenges. For reasons of comparing qualitative comparative analysis and statistical approaches, this article focuses on the four challenges. It concentrates on the small-N approach of Charles Ragin to causal inference in such settings.

Keywords: social science; comparative research; comparative analysis; statistical approaches; small-N approach

Article.  17887 words. 

Subjects: Business and Management ; Research Methods

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.