Article

Introduction

Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock and Peter Menzies

in The Oxford Handbook of Causation

Published in print November 2009 | ISBN: 9780199279739
Published online January 2010 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279739.003.0001

Series: Oxford Handbooks in Philosophy

Introduction

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Philosophy
  • Metaphysics
  • Philosophy of Science

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Philosophers have been interested in the nature of causation for as long as there has been philosophy. They have been interested in what we say about the world when we say that one thing caused another, and in whether there is anything in the world that answers to the causal claims we make about it. Despite the attention, there is still very little agreement on the most central question concerning causation: what is it? Is it a matter of the instantiation of regularities or laws, or counterfactual dependence, or manipulability, or transfer of energy, for example? One reason for the lack of a consensus view is the sheer difficulty of the task; anyone familiar with the causation debate as it has been conducted in recent years will be familiar with a vast range of theories and counterexamples, which collectively can lead one to suspect that no univocal analysis of the concept of causation is possible.

Keywords: causation; causal claims; counterfactual dependence; instantiation of law; concept of causation; manipulability

Article.  6829 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy ; Metaphysics ; Philosophy of Science

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.