Article

Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide

Margaret P. Battin

in The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics

Published in print September 2005 | ISBN: 9780199284238
Published online September 2009 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199284238.003.0027

Series: Oxford Handbooks in Philosophy

 Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Philosophy
  • Moral Philosophy

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

When the debate over euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide emerged into public consciousness in the mid-1970s, the debate got off to a rousing start, as philosophers, doctors, theologians, public-policy theorists, journalists, social advocates, and private citizens became embroiled in the debate. On the one side were liberals, who thought physician-assisted suicide and perhaps voluntary active euthanasia were ethically acceptable and should be legal; on the other side were conservatives, who believed that it was imoral and/or dangerous to legalize assisted dying as a matter of public policy. Over the next few decades in which this debate was accelerating it achieved a lively, florid richness, both as a philosophical dispute and as a broad, international public issue. This article aims to explore the richness of this debate by showing something of the terrain of the debate and the figures who have inhabited it, both the public figures and the academic ones partly behind the scenes.

Keywords: euthanasia; physician-assisted suicide; public-policy theorists; public consciousness; liberals; conservatives

Article.  15277 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy ; Moral Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.