Article

Comparative Law: Study of Similarities or Differences?

Gerhard Danneman

in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law

Published in print November 2006 | ISBN: 9780199296064
Published online September 2012 | | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0012

Series: Oxford Handbooks in Law

Comparative Law: Study of Similarities or Differences?

Preview

Comparing legal systems involves, at least to some degree, exploring both similarities and differences. For some writers, this forms part of the definition of comparative law. Some comparative lawyers have generally emphasized differences, while others see similarities, particularly in problems and their results, and a third group has sought to strike a balance between observing and analysing similarities and differences. Drawing on a debate in comparative history, this article argues that the proper balance between looking for similarities and for differences depends on the purpose of the comparative enquiry. Furthermore, it links the issue of difference or similarity to the various steps which are involved in a comparative legal enquiry, suggesting that some steps require more focus on similarity, others on difference, and many call for a balance of both.

Keywords: comparative history; comparative enquiry; comparing legal systems; legal enquiry

Article.  16967 words. 

Subjects: Law ; Comparative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribeRecommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »