Compositionality and Biologically Plausible Models

Terrence Stewart and Chris Eliasmith

in The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality

Published in print February 2012 | ISBN: 9780199541072
Published online September 2012 | | DOI:

Series: Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics

 Compositionality and Biologically Plausible Models

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Linguistics
  • Cognitive Linguistics
  • Semantics


Show Summary Details


Cognitive theories have expressed their components using an artificial symbolic language, such as first-order predicate logic, and the atoms in such representations are non-decomposable letter strings. A neural theory merely demonstrates how to implement a classical symbol system using neurons: this is actually an argument against the importance of the neural description. The fact that symbol systems are physically instantiated in neurons becomes a mere implementational detail, since there is a direct way to translate from the symbolic description to the more neurally plausible one. It might then be argued that, while the neural aspects of the theory identify how behavior arises, they are not fundamentally important for understanding that behavior. Classical symbol systems would continue to be seen as the right kinds of description for psychological processes.

Keywords: cognitive theories; artificial symbolic language; neural theory; classical symbol systems; psychological processes

Article.  8643 words. 

Subjects: Linguistics ; Cognitive Linguistics ; Semantics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.