Journal Article

The economic analysis of biodiversity: an assessment

Dieter Helm and Cameron Hepburn

in Oxford Review of Economic Policy

Published on behalf of The Oxford Review of Economic Policy Ltd

Volume 28, issue 1, pages 1-21
Published in print January 2012 | ISSN: 0266-903X
Published online March 2012 | e-ISSN: 1460-2121 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs014
The economic analysis of biodiversity: an assessment

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Environmental Economics
  • Renewable Resources and Conservation
  • Non-renewable Resources and Conservation
  • Agricultural Economics

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Biodiversity is complex, difficult to define, difficult to measure, and often involves international and intergenerational considerations. Biodiversity loss presents significant economic challenges. A great deal of economics is required to understand the issues, but a simple and important observation is that most species and ecosystems are not traded in markets, so prices are often absent and biodiversity is under-provided. Despite the formidable obstacles to high-quality economic analysis, economics has plenty to offer to biodiversity policy. First, economic valuation techniques can be employed to roughly estimate the value of the benefits provided by biodiversity and ecosystems. Second, assessing the ‘optimum’ amount of biodiversity involves recognizing that the conversion of natural capital into manufactured and human capital has so far generated vast amounts of wealth. While there may have been ‘too much biodiversity’ in the past, economic analysis suggests that this is a difficult position to hold now. Third, econometric techniques and carefully designed policy studies can assist in determining what policies are most suited to different contexts to cost-effectively reduce biodiversity loss. Fourth, political economy is helpful because international coordination is often required—ecosystems do not respect national borders and many biodiverse ecosystems are in poorer countries. This paper synthesizes the issues and proposes a research agenda, which includes improving the measurement and accounting of natural capital, improving valuation techniques and theory to provide greater guidance as to the ‘optimum’ biodiversity, and developing our understanding of the merits of different alternatives for government intervention to reduce biodiversity loss.

Keywords: biodiversity; natural capital; valuation; resource economics; CBD; CITES; protected areas; ecosystem services; eco-credits; Q50; Q57; Q58; Q10; Q20; Q30

Journal Article.  10578 words. 

Subjects: Environmental Economics ; Renewable Resources and Conservation ; Non-renewable Resources and Conservation ; Agricultural Economics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.