Journal Article

Meta-Consent in Research on Decisional Capacity: A “Catch-22”?

Elyn R Saks, Laura B Dunn and Barton W Palmer

in Schizophrenia Bulletin

Published on behalf of Maryland Psychiatric Research Center

Volume 32, issue 1, pages 42-46
ISSN: 0586-7614
Published online October 2005 | e-ISSN: 1745-1701 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbj017
Meta-Consent in Research on Decisional Capacity: A “Catch-22”?

Show Summary Details

Preview

Empirical studies of ethical issues, which have increased in number and scope in recent years, may themselves raise both practical and ethical issues. One example of such an issue is the question of who may be legitimately enrolled in studies of decision-making capacity; must all participants in studies of consent capacity have capacity to consent? This question may pose a “Catch-22”: For example, if some of the participants in a study of consent capacity are deemed by a particular standard to be incapable of consent. In weighing the risks and benefits of studies of consent capacity, how should reviewers consider the context of actual versus hypothetical trials for which the participant's consent is being sought? Here, we explore these “meta-consent” issues by describing the dimensions of the issue and potential solutions, centering around the concept of “active assent” (requiring expressed understanding of the purpose of the study and its voluntary nature, as well as expression of a choice to participate).

Keywords: decision-making capacity; research ethics; informed consent; bioethics; clinical trials

Journal Article.  3302 words. 

Subjects: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.