Journal Article

How Effective Are Second‐Generation Road Funds? A Preliminary Appraisal

Ken Gwilliam and Ajay Kumar

in The World Bank Research Observer

Published on behalf of World Bank

Volume 18, issue 1, pages 113-128
Published in print March 2003 | ISSN: 0257-3032
Published online March 2003 | e-ISSN: 1564-6971 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkg004
How Effective Are Second‐Generation Road Funds? A Preliminary Appraisal

Show Summary Details

Preview

Underfunded, inefficient road maintenance is a perennial problem in many developing economies. To address it, some countries have created “second‐generation” road funds that are financed by fuel levies and managed by boards representing the interests of road users. Macroeconomists often oppose such funds, arguing that this earmarking of revenue reduces fiscal flexibility. Some argue that such road funds should be seen as an interim step toward fully commercialized road maintenance or good public sector governance—and hence subject to sunset provisions. Decisions on whether to retain (or create) such funds should then be based on their effects on resource allocation, operational efficiency, and rent seeking. Using evidence on new road funds in Africa, this article finds that they have not undermined fiscal flexibility. Moreover, they have improved the administration of road funding (in terms of execution capability) and its outputs (in terms of road conditions). So, although criteria for assessing road funds remain relevant, the funds should not automatically be considered temporary mechanisms. But when establishing new funds, government's continued role in approving spending on road maintenance should be explicitly recognized.

Journal Article.  0 words. 

Subjects: Development Planning and Policy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.