Journal Article

Biases in, and corrections to, KSB shear measurements

M. Viola, P. Melchior and M. Bartelmann

in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Published on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society

Volume 410, issue 4, pages 2156-2166
Published in print February 2011 | ISSN: 0035-8711
Published online January 2011 | e-ISSN: 1365-2966 | DOI:
Biases in, and corrections to, KSB shear measurements

Show Summary Details


We analyse the Kaiser–Squires–Broadhurst (KSB) method to estimate gravitational shear from surface-brightness moments of small and noisy galaxy images. We identify three potentially problematic assumptions. These are as follows. (1) While gravitational shear must be estimated from averaged galaxy images, KSB derives a shear estimate from each individual image and then takes the average. Since the two operations do not commute, KSB gives biased results. (2) KSB implicitly assumes that galaxy ellipticities are small, while weak gravitational lensing only assures that the change in ellipticity due to the shear is small. (3) KSB does not invert the convolution with the point spread function (PSF), but gives an approximate PSF correction which – even for a circular PSF – holds only in the limit of circular sources. The effects of assumptions (2) and (3) partially counteract in a way dependent on the width of the weight function and of the PSF. We quantitatively demonstrate the biases due to all assumptions, extend the KSB approach consistently to third order in the shear and ellipticity and show that this extension lowers the biases substantially. The issue of proper PSF deconvolution will be addressed in Melchior et al.

Keywords: methods: data analysis; cosmology: observations

Journal Article.  6604 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Astronomy and Astrophysics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.