Journal Article

Galaxy and Mass Assembly: FUV, NUV, <i>ugrizYJHK</i> Petrosian, Kron and Sérsic photometry

David T. Hill, Lee S. Kelvin, Simon P. Driver, Aaron S. G. Robotham, Ewan Cameron, Nicholas Cross, Ellen Andrae, Ivan K. Baldry, Steven P. Bamford, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Sarah Brough, Christopher J. Conselice, Simon Dye, Andrew M. Hopkins, Jochen Liske, Jon Loveday, Peder Norberg, John A. Peacock, Scott M. Croom, Carlos S. Frenk, Alister W. Graham, D. Heath Jones, Konrad Kuijken, Barry F. Madore, Robert C. Nichol, Hannah R. Parkinson, Steven Phillipps, Kevin A. Pimbblet, Cristina C. Popescu, Matthew Prescott, Mark Seibert, Rob G. Sharp, Will J. Sutherland, Daniel Thomas, Richard J. Tuffs and Elco van Kampen

in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Published on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society

Volume 412, issue 2, pages 765-799
Published in print April 2011 | ISSN: 0035-8711
Published online March 2011 | e-ISSN: 1365-2966 | DOI:
Galaxy and Mass Assembly: FUV, NUV, ugrizYJHK Petrosian, Kron and Sérsic photometry

Show Summary Details


In order to generate credible 0.1–2 μm spectral energy distributions, the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) project requires many gigabytes of imaging data from a number of instruments to be reprocessed into a standard format. In this paper, we discuss the software infrastructure we use, and create self-consistent ugrizYJHK photometry for all sources within the GAMA sample. Using UKIDSS and SDSS archive data, we outline the pre-processing necessary to standardize all images to a common zero-point, the steps taken to correct for the seeing bias across the data set and the creation of gigapixel-scale mosaics of the three 4 × 12 deg2 GAMA regions in each filter. From these mosaics, we extract source catalogues for the GAMA regions using elliptical Kron and Petrosian matched apertures. We also calculate Sérsic magnitudes for all galaxies within the GAMA sample using sigma, a galaxy component modelling wrapper for galfit 3. We compare the resultant photometry directly and also calculate the r-band galaxy luminosity function for all photometric data sets to highlight the uncertainty introduced by the photometric method. We find that (1) changing the object detection threshold has a minor effect on the best-fitting Schechter parameters of the overall population (M*± 0.055 mag, α± 0.014, ϕ*± 0.0005 h3 Mpc−3); (2) there is an offset between data sets that use Kron or Petrosian photometry, regardless of the filter; (3) the decision to use circular or elliptical apertures causes an offset in M* of 0.20 mag; (4) the best-fitting Schechter parameters from total-magnitude photometric systems (such as SDSS modelmag or Sérsic magnitudes) have a steeper faint-end slope than photometric systems based upon Kron or Petrosian measurements; and (5) our Universe’s total luminosity density, when calculated using Kron or Petrosian r-band photometry, is underestimated by at least 15 per cent.

Keywords: methods: data analysis; methods: observational; techniques: image processing; techniques: photometric; surveys; galaxies: fundamental parameters

Journal Article.  18055 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Astronomy and Astrophysics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.