Journal Article

The expected performance of stellar parametrization with <i>Gaia</i> spectrophotometry

C. Liu, C. A. L. Bailer-Jones, R. Sordo, A. Vallenari, R. Borrachero, X. Luri and P. Sartoretti

in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Published on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society

Volume 426, issue 3, pages 2463-2482
Published in print November 2012 | ISSN: 0035-8711
Published online November 2012 | e-ISSN: 1365-2966 | DOI:
The expected performance of stellar parametrization with Gaia spectrophotometry

Show Summary Details


Gaia will obtain astrometry and spectrophotometry for essentially all sources in the sky down to a broad-band magnitude limit of G = 20, an expected yield of 109 stars. Its main scientific objective is to reveal the formation and evolution of our Galaxy through chemodynamical analysis. In addition to inferring positions, parallaxes and proper motions from the astrometry, we must also infer the astrophysical parameters of the stars from the spectrophotometry, the blue photometer (BP)/red photometer (RP) spectrum. Here we investigate the performance of three different algorithms [Support Vector Machine (SVM), ilium and Aeneas] for estimating the effective temperature, line-of-sight interstellar extinction, metallicity and surface gravity of A–M stars over a wide range of these parameters and over the full magnitude range Gaia will observe (G = 6–20 mag). One of the algorithms, Aeneas, infers the posterior probability density function over all parameters, and can optionally take into account the parallax and the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram to improve the estimates. For all algorithms the accuracy of estimation depends on G and on the value of the parameters themselves, so a broad summary of performance is only approximate. For stars at G = 15 with less than 2 mag extinction, we expect to be able to estimate Teff to within 1 per cent, log g to 0.1–0.2 dex and [Fe/H] (for FGKM stars) to 0.1–0.2 dex, just using the BP/RP spectrum (mean absolute error statistics are quoted). Performance degrades at larger extinctions, but not always by a large amount. Extinction can be estimated to an accuracy of 0.05–0.2 mag for stars across the full parameter range with a priori unknown extinction between 0 and 10 mag. Performance degrades at fainter magnitudes, but even at G = 19 we can estimate log g to better than 0.2 dex for all spectral types and to within 0.35 dex for FGKM stars, for extinctions below 1 mag.

Keywords: methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; stars: fundamental parameters; Hertzsprung; Russell and colour; magnitude diagram; dust, extinction

Journal Article.  12401 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Astronomy and Astrophysics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.