Power and Simulacra

Holly Haynes

in The History of Make-Believe

Published by University of California Press

Published in print November 2003 | ISBN: 9780520236509
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780520929555 | DOI:
Power and Simulacra

Show Summary Details


Tacitus describes Galba, Otho, and Vitellius, as well as the volgus, as simulacra, because they represent imitations of imitations. Nero revealed the truth of the principate, but although he apparently had his critics, he was still a Julio–Claudian, which was enough to sustain the balance between fingere and credere necessary for the fiction still to work. In the aftermath of his death, however, the looking to which Nero had accustomed his people no longer corresponds to the fiction itself, but to a fiction of the fiction. As the specter of the Histories, Nero represents the absence of what is necessary to maintain “reality.” The look turns into the blank gaze, which no longer makes a symbolic connection between the image and that of which it is the image of. Tacitus associates this phenomenon particularly with Vitellius and the events that occur during his regime. This chapter shows how Vitellius embodies the most destructive aspect of the fingere/credere paradigm: a gaze that turns the images of an already distorted ideology into images at the second remove.

Keywords: Tacitus; Vitellian narrative; fingere; credere; gaze; Nero; principate

Chapter.  18823 words. 

Subjects: Classical Literature

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.