Chapter

Afterword

Fiona Hughes

in Kant's Aesthetic Epistemology

Published by Edinburgh University Press

Published in print May 2007 | ISBN: 9780748621224
Published online March 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780748652327 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748621224.003.0010
Afterword

Show Summary Details

Preview

It is easy to conclude that Immanuel Kant's account of aesthetic judgement underestimates the extent to which the disharmonious plays a role in our experience. In twentieth-century contemporary art, it would be fair to say that the disharmonious holds priority over the harmonious. This raises questions about the continuing relevance not only of Kant's aesthetics, but also of his theory of knowledge. For if aesthetic judgement presents an exemplary exhibition of cognition in general, then it might appear that Kant's account of the cognitive relation between mind and world suggests much too unproblematic a ‘fit’ between the subject and the object. The importance of this is that were Kant's position to amount to the view that the mind and world simply stand in harmony with one another, he would be in severe danger of falling back into something approaching a ‘pre-established harmony’. Our capacity for moral reason allows us to go beyond the finite world of objects in thought. Kant's formal idealism has emerged as comprising a series of stages of determination.

Keywords: Immanuel Kant; aesthetic judgement; experience; aesthetics; knowledge; cognition; mind; world; moral reason; formal idealism

Chapter.  2020 words. 

Subjects: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.