Chapter

The (B)end of the Idea

Simon Glendinning

in The Idea of Continental Philosophy

Published by Edinburgh University Press

Published in print June 2006 | ISBN: 9780748624706
Published online September 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780748671885 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624706.003.0006
The (B)end of the Idea

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Social and Political Philosophy

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter compares and contrasts two responses that anyone who spends significant time with texts identified as Continental philosophy is likely to experience: that of the “ender” and that of the “bender”. The ender is the one who knows that the very idea of a Continental tradition is contentious or even perverse and so will be inclined to work with a certain lack of interest in securing or maintaining the idea of the analytic/Continental division. The bender response demands that we acknowledge the de facto distinction, and its real world gulf-effects, and is willing to appropriate the title “Continental philosophy” for their own work in order to do so. The argument of the book concludes that whether one might want to take on the responsibility of using this title oneself will remain the singular existential-institutional question for every reader of “Continental philosophy” for some time to come.

Keywords: “enders”; “benders”; “de facto distinction”; “existential-institutional question”

Chapter.  5508 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Social and Political Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.