Chapter

Conclusion

Russell Daylight

in What if Derrida Was Wrong About Saussure?

Published by Edinburgh University Press

Published in print January 2011 | ISBN: 9780748641970
Published online September 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780748671564 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748641970.003.0010
Conclusion

Show Summary Details

Preview

One of the principal ambitions of this book is to gather together, from a vantage point somewhere in between Jacques Derrida and Ferdinand de Saussure, all of Derrida's commentary and work upon the Course in General Linguistics. Beginning with the progress of semiology, with the loosening of metaphysics, Saussure is, according to Derrida, the thinker who instituted the field of semiology based on the arbitrary and differential character of the sign. Saussure's originality within the tradition of the concept of the sign is to imagine the signifier and signified as dematerialised and differential entities. In ‘Structure, Sign, and Play’, Derrida considers the ‘event’ of structuralism within the history of the concept of structure. In Of Grammatology, Derrida considers the role of Saussurean phonocentrism in the effort to maintain a mental experience independent of a relationship to language. For Derrida, meaning does not come to rest in a structure, but continues indefinitely in a ‘systematic play of differences’, and he calls this différance. Subject and object, synchrony and diachrony, writing and speech, are utilised by Saussure as already present entities.

Keywords: Jacques Derrida; Ferdinand de Saussure; sign; différance; semiology; metaphysics; structuralism; phonocentrism; language; speech

Chapter.  6915 words. 

Subjects: Linguistics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.