Early Military Confiscation

John Syrett

in The Civil War Confiscation Acts

Published by Fordham University Press

Published in print April 2005 | ISBN: 9780823224890
Published online September 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780823240852 | DOI:

Series: Reconstructing America

Early Military Confiscation

Show Summary Details


The military commanders and troops encountered confiscable property before any other government officials and, through martial law, could have prevented transfers of property titles. Attorney General Bates, with Lincoln's support, also opposed military confiscation except as related to slavery. Bates's concern over military interference involving confiscation, the amount of property the military confiscated under either act was not large. Butler's interest in confiscating property particularly that of prominent rebels, increased after the second act became law. The military used confiscation to justify the destruction or seizure of other forms of rebel property as they moved into the South. The second act's most significant impact on Southern property involved the military's changed view of slavery and contrabands from July 1862. Slaves could not be freed under the second act unless a court adjudicated the issue. What the second act did was support the changing views on how to conduct the war.

Keywords: Attorney General Bates; military; troops; confiscation; slavery; martial law

Chapter.  7066 words. 

Subjects: History of the Americas

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Fordham University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.