Chapter

Medicine and Authority

Jonathan Strauss

in Human Remains

Published by Fordham University Press

Published in print February 2012 | ISBN: 9780823233793
Published online May 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780823241262 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823233793.003.0002

Series: Forms of Living

Medicine and Authority

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter uses press accounts to reconstruct a spectacular case of necrophilia from the mid-nineteenth century. The subsequent trial emblematized the rivalries between medicine and the courts. There were two principal points of dispute: on the one hand doctors argued that the medical profession should be self-governing (and largely, therefore, beyond the purview of the jurists); and on the other they attempted to increase their influence on legal decisions, especially in their role as expert witnesses. At the same time, to secure a position of influence and credibility within society, the medical profession also had to establish its independence from the Catholic Church, and it was able to assume much of the authority that the clergy had previously enjoyed. The late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries thus saw the rise in France of a new language for making sense of social and asocial behaviors.

Keywords: François Bertrand; necrophilia; forensic medicine; legal decisions

Chapter.  12955 words. 

Subjects: Literature

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Fordham University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.