Chapter

Concrete Philosophy

Brian Treanor

in Aspects of Alterity

Published by Fordham University Press

Published in print January 2006 | ISBN: 9780823226849
Published online March 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780823235100 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823226849.003.0005

Series: Perspectives in Continental Philosophy

Concrete Philosophy

Show Summary Details

Preview

While Emmanuel Levinas's critique is transcendental, Gabriel Marcel's is “concrete” or “existential”. Marcel's existential critique takes two general forms, although, to all intents and purposes, they amount to the same thing. He either attacks the “spirit of abstraction” that thinks it can understand the whole by abstracting and analyzing a part, or, without explicitly accusing a philosophy of abstraction, points out that it does not account for the fullness of lived experience. This chapter focuses on issues at a confluence of two dialogues. First, between Marcel and Levinas on the question of the existential accuracy of their respective accounts of intersubjectivity and alterity. Second, between Levinas and his (explicit) interlocutors and critics regarding those criticisms in line with the first dialogue.

Keywords: Emmanuel Levinas; Gabriel Marcel; philosophy; existential critique; alterity; intersubjectivity

Chapter.  11598 words. 

Subjects: Moral Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Fordham University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.