Chapter

. <i>Washington</i> v. <i>Glucksberg</i> (1997) and Assisted Suicide

George Anastaplo

in Reflections on Life, Death, and the Constitution

Published by University Press of Kentucky

Published in print June 2009 | ISBN: 9780813125336
Published online September 2011 | e-ISBN: 9780813135243 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813125336.003.0022
. Washington v. Glucksberg (1997) and Assisted Suicide

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter discusses the ethical and legal issues on the development of unprecedented means for ministering to the bodies of severely afflicted patients. It examines the Glucksberg case which deals on whether the United States Constitution keeps a State from forbidding a doctor (or anyone else) from assisting in the suicide of a desperately ill patient. It notes that it seems to be generally agreed among medical doctors, that the deliberate withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatments from a terminally ill patient may be neither euthanasia nor assisted suicide. It provides that State laws regulating medical practice generally distinguish between “killing” (which is forbidden) and “letting go” (which is permitted). Furthermore, it provides that the American Medical Association guidelines with respect to these matters also seem to permit the use by doctors of “terminal sedation,” the administration of an amount of sedation for intense pain which is likely to shorten the patient's life.

Keywords: ethical issues; legal issues; Glucksberg case; United States Constitution; terminally ill patient; euthanasia; assisted suicide; killing; letting go; terminal sedation

Chapter.  2462 words. 

Subjects: US Politics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at University Press of Kentucky »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.