Chapter

Comments on Ayers ‘Spinoza, Platonism and Naturalism’

SARAH HUTTON

in Rationalism, Platonism and God

Published by British Academy

Published in print December 2007 | ISBN: 9780197264201
Published online February 2012 | e-ISBN: 9780191734670 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197264201.003.0005

Series: Proceedings of the British Academy

Comments on Ayers ‘Spinoza, Platonism and Naturalism’

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • History of Western Philosophy

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter comments on Michael Ayers’ chapter on the strands of Platonism and naturalism in philosopher Baruch Spinoza’s metaphysics. It explains the sources of Spinoza’s Platonism and his departure from Platonism and suggests that Spinoza’s epistemology is deeply subversive of Platonism. It argues that a case can be made for Spinoza’s having a stronger debt to Platonism, even in the area which in which Ayers identified as the least Platonic aspect of his philosophy.

Keywords: Platonism; naturalism; Baruch Spinoza; metaphysics; Michael Ayers; epistemology

Chapter.  4126 words. 

Subjects: History of Western Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at British Academy »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.