Philosophy and Science

in Encounters & Reflections

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print February 2003 | ISBN: 9780226042787
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226042770 | DOI:
Philosophy and Science

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • History of Western Philosophy


Show Summary Details


This chapter is a conversation among three students—Michael, Ronna, and Robert—and their professor Seth Benardete at the University of Chicago about the difference between preparing for philosophy and philosophizing, and the contrast between Leo Strauss and Martin Heidegger in those terms. If Heidegger represented speculative philosophy in the twentieth century, Strauss was ostensibly in awe of it and did not approve of it at all. In a two-fold character of interpretation, there is a distinction between the thematization of something and the question of its truth, and the first is rather difficult. This is what the problem of the Sophist is in a nutshell: there is a thematization of hunting for the purpose of understanding the sophist, but there is no thematization of philosophy. Strauss realized that interpreting a Platonic dialogue is philosophizing; however, it does not mean that only by interpreting Plato could one philosophize.

Keywords: Seth Benardete; philosophy; Leo Strauss; Martin Heidegger; Sophist; Platonic dialogue

Chapter.  10636 words. 

Subjects: History of Western Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.