Chapter

The Controversy over Sociobiology: Scholars Offer Conflicting Explanations

in Shaping Science with Rhetoric

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print July 2001 | ISBN: 9780226099064
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226099088 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226099088.003.0006
The Controversy over Sociobiology: Scholars Offer Conflicting Explanations

Show Summary Details

Preview

Sociobiology was seen to be in “its logical position as the bridging discipline between the natural sciences on the one side and social sciences and humanities on the other.” A majority of scholars in the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities who have written book reviews of Consilience have responded negatively to Wilson's latest appeal for interdisciplinarity. Readers have called Wilson's interdisciplinary erasing of the boundaries between the natural sciences and the humanities and social sciences “indefensible,” a sermon “shaky in substance” that is based on “a distressingly flat account of disciplines and their boundaries.” They complain that his notion of consilience rides on a “dubious assumption” about the proper relation between disciplines is grounded on purported links between natural science and social science that are “fatally weak,” and in the end will “not neatly solve any of the problems he notes, especially in the humanities and social sciences.”

Keywords: sociobiology; consilience; interdisciplinary; natural science; dubious assumption

Chapter.  6665 words. 

Subjects: Philosophy of Science

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.