: The Costly Charade: Habeas and State Prisoners Today

in Habeas for the Twenty-First Century

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print April 2011 | ISBN: 9780226436975
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226436968 | DOI:
: The Costly Charade: Habeas and State Prisoners Today

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law


Show Summary Details


This chapter, which discusses the results of Professor Nancy King's recent empirical study of habeas filings in the federal district courts, presents the most complete picture of habeas litigation in federal district courts since the 1996 amendments to the habeas statute. It is shown that habeas review cannot serve as an effective means of correcting or deterring error in individual state criminal cases. The unavailability of habeas effectively ensured that it does not, and cannot, provide any meaningful correction of error or deterrence of constitutional misconduct by state officials in the vast majority of state criminal cases. Federal habeas corpus review of state noncapital criminal cases once helped to transform the institutional structure of judicial review of constitutional claims; today it is an almost completely wasted effort. In the 1960s and 1970s, expansive habeas review of state criminal cases was needed to help obtain the writ's traditional goals.

Keywords: habeas filings; federal district courts; habeas litigation; habeas statute; habeas corpus review; state criminal cases; Professor Nancy King

Chapter.  7302 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.