: Habeas and the Death Penalty

in Habeas for the Twenty-First Century

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print April 2011 | ISBN: 9780226436975
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226436968 | DOI:
: Habeas and the Death Penalty

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law


Show Summary Details


This chapter investigates the habeas review of federal death sentences, specifically exploring how habeas litigation in capital cases became what it is today. The Supreme Court has increasingly employed the Eighth Amendment to enforce substantive restrictions on the use of capital punishment. It seemed that the Court aimed at developing two separate strands of Eighth Amendment proportionality doctrine: one for capital cases and another for noncapital cases. The story of habeas corpus and the story of the death penalty in the modern era of the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence have been inextricably interlaced. The legal battle over capital punishment has been fought primarily on the battleground of habeas. In noncapital cases, habeas litigation was merely a wasteful nuisance. However, in capital cases, habeas continued to be center stage in a prolonged and bitter struggle that shows no signs of ending any time soon.

Keywords: habeas review; federal death sentences; habeas litigation; capital cases; noncapital cases; Supreme Court; Eighth Amendment; habeas corpus; death penalty

Chapter.  5081 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.