: The Future of Capital Habeas

in Habeas for the Twenty-First Century

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print April 2011 | ISBN: 9780226436975
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226436968 | DOI:
: The Future of Capital Habeas

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law


Show Summary Details


This chapter describes what is believed to be the most appropriate role for habeas in the context of capital litigation. The future of habeas corpus in capital cases is addressed. The Supreme Court's efforts had only limited success; petitions in capital cases continued to be granted at a relatively high rate. The habeas played a greater role in the death penalty. Habeas can ensure that arbitrary governmental actions do not trample on the fundamental rights and liberties of individuals. It is noted that there is a special need for habeas review in capital cases which is not present in noncapital cases. It would seem to make sense to permit federal judges to avoid the complicated analyses of procedural default and filing deadlines and simply deny claims after consideration on the merits, as they are able to do with claims that have yet to be exhausted in state court.

Keywords: habeas corpus; capital litigation; Supreme Court; capital cases; death penalty; federal judges; habeas review

Chapter.  7001 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.