Chapter

Eunuchs and Women

in The Female in Aristotle's Biology

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print August 2004 | ISBN: 9780226512006
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226512020 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226512020.003.0004
Eunuchs and Women

Show Summary Details

Preview

That Aristotle claims that females are, as it were, deformed when compared to males, might reasonably be thought to have a strong ideological flavor. Aristotle did not believe that animal generation involves the transmission to the womb of an already formed mini-male or mini-female, but concluded that maintaining an analogy between females and mutilated males—between women and eunuchs—had a great deal of explanatory power. His closest exposure to castration and its effects must have been his own research on the castration of animals. Aristotle concluded from his observations about castration that just as a relatively small change to the body of an animal can affect the whole animal, so a small change in the development of an embryo could affect not only the area that was directly changed but also the physical nature of the whole animal that results.

Keywords: Aristotle; females; eunuchs; mini-male; mini-female

Chapter.  6325 words. 

Subjects: Ancient Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.