Chapter

1791: The National Bank and the Point of Interpretation

in A Community Built on Words

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print September 2002 | ISBN: 9780226677231
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226677224 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226677224.003.0003
1791: The National Bank and the Point of Interpretation

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

The one constitutional dispute of importance in the early Republic that all American law students invariably study in some detail is the question whether Congress has the power to incorporate a national bank. This is not, to be sure, out of any historical interest in national banks on the part of most constitutional lawyers, or out of any present-day concern over the constitutionality of the Federal Reserve, “to question which would be to lay hands on the Ark of the Covenant.” Students study the issue because Chief Justice John Marshall wrote about it in 1819, memorably and for a unanimous Supreme Court, in M'Culloch v. Maryland. This chapter, however, is concerned with the beginnings of the dispute, in 1791.

Keywords: constitutional dispute; national bank; Congress; constitutional law; Federal Reserve; Ark of the Covenant

Chapter.  4079 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.