Chapter

1862: Four Attorneys General and the Meaning of Citizenship

in A Community Built on Words

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print September 2002 | ISBN: 9780226677231
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226677224 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226677224.003.0018
1862: Four Attorneys General and the Meaning of Citizenship

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

The issue of whether African Americans were to be counted as members of the body politic that Judge Ruffin raised suggestively through his language in State v. Mann was squarely addressed by his contemporaries in a variety of settings, not least in a series of opinions by federal attorneys general stretching from eight years before Mann until a month before the Emancipation Proclamation. In 1821, Attorney General William Wirt received a request for advice from the secretary of the treasury, William Crawford, acting on behalf of the collector of customs at Norfolk, Virginia. Federal law mandated that the master of an American-flag vessel be a “citizen of the United States,” and Crawford's inquiry was whether a free African American resident in Virginia satisfied this requirement. Wirt began his opinion by assuming that Congress had intended its statutory use of the expression to carry the same meaning as in the Constitution.

Keywords: African Americans; Judge Ruffin; State v. Mann; federal attorneys general; William Wirt; federal law

Chapter.  2970 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.