A Question of Degree

in Constitutional Conscience

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print June 2008 | ISBN: 9780226677255
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226677309 | DOI:
A Question of Degree

Show Summary Details


This chapter examines how a constitutional decision maker might go about making interpretive choices in addressing a constitutional question that is open to more than one plausible answer. It focuses on a legal opinion that a nineteenth-century attorney general, Amos Akerman, gave the president. It shows that Akerman modeled an approach to addressing disputable questions of constitutional law that employs legal craftsmanship not to conceal difficulties or hidden springs of decision but to render them transparent and thus to enable the reader to evaluate critically the conclusions reached by the writer. Such an approach brings the language of constitutional interpretation into accord with the reality of constitutional decision, and in doing so satisfies the duties of the constitutional conscience. The chapter also addresses the parallel between constitutional interpreters in the political branches (Akerman, for example) and judges making constitutional decisions. It concludes that while there are differences, they are more a matter of degree than of kind, and extreme skepticism about political-branch interpretation is unnecessary and inappropriate, and likely to be self-fulfilling.

Keywords: Amos Akerman; legal opinion; attorney general; constitutional law; craftsmanship; constitutional decision; conscience; constitutional interpretation

Chapter.  8172 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.