Political Disputes: Military, Malapportionment, Injunctions, and Constitutional Law

in Measuring Judicial Independence

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print February 2003 | ISBN: 9780226703886
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226703879 | DOI:
Political Disputes: Military, Malapportionment, Injunctions, and Constitutional Law

Show Summary Details


This chapter analyzes a broad range of politically charged cases in Japan. It uses several proxies for a judge's seniority, intelligence, effort, and ideology. It holds constant those proxies and examines the careers of judges who held either the Self-Defense Force (the SDF) or U.S. bases unconstitutional; judges who rejected national electoral apportionment schemes advantageous to the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP); and judges who enjoined the national government in administrative-law suits. Systematically, the chapter finds that they suffered in their careers. It concludes by comparing the incentives presented by these disputes with the incentives in important but less politically charged cases in constitutional and commercial law. The chapter begins by briefly discussing the context of public-law litigation in Japan at the Supreme Court level. It then explores the connection between lower-court opinions in such cases and judicial careers. Finally, it compares those results with the career effects of two sets of less political but still important cases.

Keywords: political disputes; constitutional law; Liberal Democratic Party; administrative-law suits; public-law litigation; judicial career

Chapter.  7661 words. 

Subjects: Comparative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.