Chapter

Checks and Balances in Law and History

in Madison's Nightmare

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print May 2009 | ISBN: 9780226749396
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226749426 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226749426.003.0002
Checks and Balances in Law and History

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter investigates the legal debates that surround the current growth of presidential power. The 2006 confirmation battle concerning Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito brought to many citizens' consciousness the fact of a disagreement among constitutional scholars and practitioners about something called “the unitary presidency.” The issue dividing presidentialists and pluralists is whether the President's constitutionally based administrative powers include the authority to take over or command all policy making discretion that Congress has delegated to anyone within the executive branch. The Constitution simply does not command the unitary presidency in domestic affairs that the presidentialists imagine. It gives Congress and the courts considerably more influence than presidentialists would prefer in delimiting presidential authority. The inherited Constitution from the Framers provides profound roles for both Congress and the judiciary in setting the appropriate bounds of executive power.

Keywords: presidential power; unitary presidency; presidentialists; Constitution; Congress; presidential authority; executive power

Chapter.  12503 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.