Reforming Science

in Reforming Philosophy

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print August 2006 | ISBN: 9780226767338
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226767352 | DOI:
Reforming Science

Show Summary Details


This chapter discusses the controversy between Mill and Whewell over the confirmation of scientific theories. This debate is related to their differing opinions over the nature of inductive inference and the type of knowledge we can reach inductively. Whewell believed we could make reliable probable inferences to empirical truths about unobserved causes and entities. Mill, on the other hand, denied us even probable knowledge of unobserved causes and entities. Thus Whewell accepted, and Mill rejected, the claim that through science, we can gain knowledge of the underlying causal structure of nature. This difference is reflected in their respective views about classification. Whewell maintained that scientists discover groupings of things that reflect the causal structure of the physical world; that is, scientists discover natural kinds.

Keywords: causal structure; scientific theories; nature; entities; physical world; causes

Chapter.  22556 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.