The Judicial Understanding of Costly Foreign Policy Events

in The Judicial Power of the Purse

Published by University of Chicago Press

Published in print May 2011 | ISBN: 9780226771120
Published online March 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780226771151 | DOI:
The Judicial Understanding of Costly Foreign Policy Events

Show Summary Details


This chapter turns to qualitative evidence found in judicial opinions, courtroom filings, and law clerks' memoranda. It is observed that judges are aware of the high financial costs of war and eagerly use their decision-making powers to enable the nation to purchase increasing levels of defense, but only when it appears necessary for success on the battlefield. Thus, the justices sought to expand the fisc before and after the cold war period, but systematically attempted to pinch the fisc during the cold war in the absence of spikes in defense spending. Courts were in a position to impose costs on the government and fully recognize these costs could have an effect on military strategizing and eventual success. The qualitative evidence and the courtroom commentary further supported the information theory of crisis jurisprudence, illustrating the theory provides a credible and realistic account of judicial behavior.

Keywords: judges; fisc; cold war; defense; judicial opinions; courtroom filings; crisis jurisprudence

Chapter.  9155 words. 

Subjects: Constitutional and Administrative Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.