National identity and the ‘great divide’

Alex J. Bellamy

in The Formation of Croatian National Identity

Published by Manchester University Press

Published in print December 2003 | ISBN: 9780719065026
Published online July 2012 | e-ISBN: 9781781700440 | DOI:
National identity and the ‘great divide’

Show Summary Details


According to Tom Nairn, ‘the reason why the dispute between modernists and primordialists is not resolved is because it is irresolvable’. Nairn described the so-called ‘Warwick debate’, between Anthony Smith and Ernest Gellner, as a ‘courteous difference of emphasis’. The ‘great debate’ in nationalism studies, captured at Warwick, is one between so-called ‘primordialists’ and ‘modernists’. Put simply, primordialists argue that the nation derives directly from a priori ethnic groups and is based on kinship ties and ancient heritage. For their part, modernists insist that the nation is an entirely novel form of identity and political organisation, which owes nothing to ethnic heritage and everything to the modern dynamics of industrial capitalism. This chapter provides a brief overview of the two positions but concludes that primordialism and modernism, and the scope of the debate between them, fail to offer a satisfactory account of the formation of national identity. It also explores the central problem with accounts that emerge from the ‘great divide’.

Keywords: Anthony Smith; Ernest Gellner; national identity; great divide; primordialism; modernism; nationalism; industrial capitalism; ethnic heritage; Warwick debate

Chapter.  5948 words. 

Subjects: International Relations

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.