James McDermott

in British Military Service Tribunals, 1916–18

Published by Manchester University Press

Published in print May 2011 | ISBN: 9780719084775
Published online July 2012 | e-ISBN: 9781781702673 | DOI:

Show Summary Details


This chapter suggests that the Tribunals' priorities and preconceptions, influenced both by growing self-awareness of their powers and responsibilities, and by the developing needs of the military and local economy, shifted conspicuously during the course of the conscription period. In Northamptonshire, idiosyncratic distinctions between certain Tribunals are readily discernible, and these often determined the likelihood of an application being heard sympathetically. The diversity and relative strength of personalities were potentially major factors in setting policy. The two major employers in Northamptonshire—agriculture and boot and shoe—were partially protected by certified occupations lists but increasingly subjected to combing-out. The Military Service Tribunal was envisaged as a safety valve for the anticipated grievances of a society unused to, and suspicious of, coercive recruitment.

Keywords: Military Service Tribunal; Northamptonshire; policy; agriculture; boot; shoe

Chapter.  5888 words. 

Subjects: Military History

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.