Chapter

The Ambiguity Question

Steven J. Burton

in Elements of Contract Interpretation

Published in print October 2008 | ISBN: 9780195337495
Published online January 2009 | e-ISBN: 9780199868650 | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195337495.003.0004
 The Ambiguity Question

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter considers the question of ambiguity. Under the plain meaning rule, an unambiguous contract will be given its unambiguous meaning as a matter of law. When determining whether a contract is unambiguous, most courts consider the contract on its face, excluding parol evidence and giving the words their ordinary meaning(s). Other courts consider the contract's context before deciding whether the contract is ambiguous. A few authorities would dispense with the question of ambiguity as a distinct task in contract interpretation. The law of civil procedure, however, thrusts the question of ambiguity into contract law. If a contract is unambiguous, there is no material question of fact for a fact-finder to determine upon a trial. Summary judgment or a comparable motion then is appropriate.

Keywords: plain meaning; ambiguous contract; unambiguous contract; parol evidence; extrinsic evidence; ordinary meaning; summary judgment

Chapter.  17124 words. 

Subjects: Civil Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.