Chapter

Can Judges Use Business Common Sense in Interpreting Contracts?

Lord Hodge

in Comparative Contract Law

Published in print December 2015 | ISBN: 9780198728733
Published online January 2016 | e-ISBN: 9780191795480 | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198728733.003.0029
Can Judges Use Business Common Sense in Interpreting Contracts?

Show Summary Details

Preview

This chapter poses the question: can judges use business common sense in interpreting contracts? It reviews the use of contextual interpretation in the US and then lays out important factors for courts to consider in the interpretive process (and to determine whether the use of contextual evidence is appropriate)—formality of the contract in question; danger of an over-literal (formalistic) approach; how certain interpretations affect third parties; the long-term or relational nature of a given contract; and the benefits and pitfalls of a purposive approach to interpretation. It offers five interpretative propositions, before analysing the convergence and divergence of English and Scottish approaches to contractual interpretation.

Keywords: contract law; interpretation; business common sense; context; relational contracts; purposive approach; formality; third parties

Chapter.  7051 words. 

Subjects: Comparative Law ; Civil Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.