Robert Stevens

in Torts and Rights

Published in print September 2007 | ISBN: 9780199211609
Published online January 2009 | e-ISBN: 9780191705946 | DOI:

Show Summary Details


The rule in Lumley v Gye is best explained on the basis that contractual rights carry with them a secondary right good against the rest of the world that they do not induce its infringement. The serpent was worse than Eve, and it is a wrong to undermine the bond of trust between persons upon which promises rely by procuring their breach. There is no general principle of accessory liability for wrongs committed by others. The most closely related wrong is found in equity: dishonest assistance in a breach of fiduciary duty.

Keywords: procuring breach of contract; Lumley v Gye; dishonest assistance; accessory liability

Chapter.  4834 words. 

Subjects: Civil Law

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.