Journal Article

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

Patrick M Bossuyt, Johannes B Reitsma, David E Bruns, Constantine A Gatsonis, Paul P Glasziou, Les M Irwig, Jeroen G Lijmer, David Moher, Drummond Rennie and Henrica CW de Vet

in Family Practice

Volume 21, issue 1, pages 4-10
Published in print February 2004 | ISSN: 0263-2136
Published online February 2004 | e-ISSN: 1460-2229 | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmh103
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Primary Care

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Objective. Our aim was to improve the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy in order to allow readers to assess the potential for bias in a study and to evaluate the generalizability of its results.

Methods. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) steering committee searched the literature to identify publications on the appropriate conduct and reporting of diagnostic studies and extracted potential items into an extensive list. Researchers, editors and members of professional organizations shortened this list during a 2-day consensus meeting with the goal of developing a checklist and a generic flow diagram for studies of diagnostic accuracy.

Results. The search for published guidelines about diagnostic research yielded 33 previously published checklists, from which we extracted a list of 75 potential items. At the consensus meeting, participants shortened the list to a 25-item checklist, by using evidence whenever available. A prototype of a flow diagram provides information about the method of recruitment of patients, the order of test execution and the numbers of patients undergoing the test under evaluation and/or the reference standard.

Conclusions. Evaluation of research depends on complete and accurate reporting. If medical journals adopt the checklist and the flow diagram, the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy should improve, to the advantage of clinicians, researchers, reviewers, journals and the public.

Keywords: Checklist; diagnostic accuracy; flow diagram; reporting; sensitivity and specificity

Journal Article.  3124 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Primary Care

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.