Journal Article

ABOLISHING THE PRICE SQUEEZE AS A THEORY OF ANTITRUST LIABILITY

J. Gregory Sidak

in Journal of Competition Law & Economics

Volume 4, issue 2, pages 279-309
Published in print June 2008 | ISSN: 1744-6414
Published online June 2008 | e-ISSN: 1744-6422 | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhn018
ABOLISHING THE PRICE SQUEEZE AS A THEORY OF ANTITRUST LIABILITY

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Antitrust Issues and Policies
  • Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

A “price squeeze,” or “margin squeeze,” is a theory of antitrust liability under section 2 of the Sherman Act that concerns a vertically integrated monopolist that sells its upstream bottleneck input to firms that compete with the monopolist's production of a downstream product sold to end users. At issue is the size of the margin between the monopolist's input price and its retail price. Recent antitrust price-squeeze cases have split the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The D.C. Circuit has concluded that, because a vertically integrated monopolist may refuse to provide its upstream inputs to its downstream competitors, it may raise the price of its upstream inputs without incurring antitrust liability. On the other hand, the Ninth Circuit's 2007 linkLine decision rejected such reasoning, notwithstanding Trinko. Predicated on Judge Learned Hand's opinion in Alcoa, linkLine subordinates the protection of consumers to the protection of competitors. It requires access-pricing analysis that more resembles the work of a public utilities commission than that of a federal judge in an antitrust case. Further, the antitrust laws are concerned with the competitive process, not its end results. The inability of a single firm to stay in business is irrelevant as a matter of antitrust law unless the behavior inducing that firm to exit the market also harms the competitive process. The Supreme Court should reverse linkLine and resolve the circuit split. It should revisit Alcoa and explain why alleging a price squeeze neither states a claim in American antitrust law nor justifies deviation from the principles announced in Brooke Group and Trinko.

Keywords: K21; L12

Journal Article.  13600 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Antitrust Issues and Policies ; Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or purchase to access all content.