Whether the Panel was precluded from examining the validity of the invocation of Article XXI:(b)(iii) of the GATT 1947, and whether the interpretation of this provision was reserved entirely to the party invoking it (justiciability).
Whether the Panel was required to interpret Article XXI:(b)(iii) of the GATT 1947 in light of the basic principles of international law, especially the right of self-defence, and in harmony with the decisions of the United Nations and of the International Court of Justice.
Whether the good faith principle was applicable to a non-violation case, even when the Panel was unable to reach a conclusion as to the GATT-consistency of the embargo at issue.
Keywords: International Court of Justice (ICJ); Self-defence; UN General Assembly; UN Security Council; Good faith; Rules of treaty interpretation; International courts and tribunals, jurisdiction; Non-justiciability
Legal Material. 10734 words.
Subjects: Public International Law ; International Law ; Law
Full text: subscription required