Journal Article

Analysis of the style and the rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential primaries

Jacques Savoy

in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities

Published on behalf of EADH: The European Association for Digital Humanities

Volume 33, issue 1, pages 143-159
Published in print April 2018 | ISSN: 2055-7671
Published online February 2017 | e-ISSN: 2055-768X | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx007
Analysis of the style and the rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential primaries

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Language Teaching and Learning
  • Computational Linguistics
  • Bibliography
  • Digital Lifestyle
  • Information and Communication Technologies

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Abstract

This present article examines the verbal style and rhetoric of the candidates of the 2016 US presidential primary elections. To achieve this objective, this study analyzes the oral communication forms used by the candidates during the TV debates. When considering the most frequent lemmas, the candidates can be split into two groups, one using more frequently the pronoun ‘I’, and the second favoring more the ‘we’ (which corresponds to candidates leaving the presidential run sooner). According to several overall stylistic indicators, candidate Trump clearly adopted a simple and direct communication style, avoiding complex formulation and vocabulary. From a topical perspective, our analysis generates a map showing the affinities between candidates. This investigation results in the presence of three distinct groups of candidates, the first one with the Democrats (Clinton, O’Malley, and Sanders), the second with three Republicans (Bush, Cruz, Rubio), and the last with the duo Trump and Kasich, with, at a small distance, Paul. The over-used terms and typical sentences associated with each candidate reveal their specific topics such as ‘simple flat tax’ for Cruz, ‘balanced budget’ for Kasich, negativity with Trump, or critiques against large corporations and Wall Street for Sanders.

Journal Article.  9209 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Language Teaching and Learning ; Computational Linguistics ; Bibliography ; Digital Lifestyle ; Information and Communication Technologies

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.