Journal Article

A Method for Classifying User-Reported Electronic Cigarette Liquid Flavors

Jessica M Yingst, Susan Veldheer, Erin Hammett, Shari Hrabovsky and Jonathan Foulds

in Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Volume 19, issue 11, pages 1381-1385
Published in print November 2017 | ISSN: 1462-2203
Published online January 2017 | e-ISSN: 1469-994X | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw383
A Method for Classifying User-Reported Electronic Cigarette Liquid Flavors

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Addictions and Substance Misuse

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Abstract

Background

Along with the growth in popularity of electronic cigarette devices (e-cigs), the variety of e-cig liquids (e-liquid) available to users has also grown. Although some studies have published data about the use of flavored e-liquid, there is no standardized way to group flavors, making it difficult to interpret the data and replicate results across studies. The current study describes a method to classify user-reported e-liquid flavors and presents the resulting proportion of users in each flavor group in a large online survey of e-cig users.

Methods

Three thousand seven hundred sixteen participants completed an online survey about their e-cig use and responded to the following open-ended question regarding their use of e-liquid, “What is your favorite flavor and what brand of flavored liquid do you prefer?” Researchers used a 3 step method to determine the flavor attributes present in the e-liquids reported using an online search engine. Once all flavor attributes were identified, researchers used the constant comparative method to group the flavor attributes and delineate how to classify flavors with mixed components (eg, cinnamon Red Hots as a candy not a spice).

Results

The resulting classification scheme and proportions of e-liquids in each category were as follows: Tobacco (23.7%), Menthol/mint (14.8%), Fruit (20.3%), Dessert/sweets (20.7%), Alcohol (2.8%), Nuts/spices (2.0%), Candy (2.1%), Coffee/tea (4.3%), Beverage (3.1%), Unflavored (0.4%), and Don’t Know/Other (5.8%).

Conclusion

To better understand the use of flavored e-liquids, standardized methods to classify the flavors could facilitate data interpretation and comparison across studies. This study proposes a method for classifying the characterizing flavors in e-liquids used most commonly by experienced e-cig users.

Implications

Current studies on the use of flavored e-liquid have used unclear methods to collect and report information on the use of flavors. This study adds a proposed method for classifying the flavors in the e-liquids used most commonly by experienced e-cig users. With a clear and explicit method for classifying self-reported flavors, future study results may be more easily compared.

Journal Article.  3988 words. 

Subjects: Public Health and Epidemiology ; Addictions and Substance Misuse

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.