Martin Camper

in Arguing over Texts

Published in print December 2017 | ISBN: 9780190677121
Published online November 2017 | e-ISBN: 9780190677152 | DOI:

Show Summary Details


Chapter 7 investigates the multiple ways arguers can question the legitimacy of an interpretation, thereby entering the stasis of jurisdiction. There are two main points of contention in this stasis: whether the person issuing the interpretation has the right to do so, and whether the interpreted text has any authority on the issue at hand. Other concerns involve the place, time, style, and delivery of an interpretation, as well as the hermeneutic method behind an interpretation. This chapter’s extended analysis examines the lines of argument fifteenth-century Italian humanist Lorenzo Valla employed to discredit the forged Donation of Constantine, an imperial decree allegedly written by Constantine the Great that ceded power over the Western Roman Empire to the pope. Studying the types of arguments people use in the stasis of jurisdiction reveals the specific ways that communities manage, control, and coordinate acts of textual interpretation in alignment with their values.

Keywords: canonicity; Donation of Constantine; felicity conditions; forgery; J. L. Austin; jurisdiction; Lorenzo Valla; procedural stasis; textual criticism; peristases

Chapter.  11215 words. 

Subjects: Psycholinguistics

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.