Journal Article

Assessing China's exchange rate regime

Jeffrey A. Frankel and Shang-Jin Wei

in Economic Policy

Published on behalf of Center for Economic Studies of the University of Munich

Volume 22, issue 51, pages 576-627
Published in print July 2007 | ISSN: 0266-4658
Published online August 2014 | e-ISSN: 1468-0327 | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2007.00185.x
Assessing China's exchange rate regime

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
  • Financial Regulation
  • Health, Education, and Welfare
  • Labour and Demographic Economics
  • Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
  • Public Economics
  • Regional Government Analysis

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

The IMF Articles of Agreement forbid a country from manipulating its currency for unfair advantage. The US Treasury has been legally required since 1988 to report to Congress biannually regarding whether individual trading partners are guilty of manipulation. One part of this paper tests econometrically two competing sets of hypothesized determinants of the Treasury decisions: (1) legitimate economic variables consistent with the IMF definition of manipulation – the partners’ overall current account/GDP, its reserve changes and the real overvaluation of its currency, and (2) variables suggestive of domestic American political expediency – the bilateral trade balance, US unemployment and an election year dummy. The econometric results suggest that the Treasury verdicts are driven heavily by the US bilateral deficit, though other variables also turn out to be quite important.

In 2005 China announced a switch to a new exchange rate regime. The exchange rate would be set with reference to a basket of other currencies, with numerical weights unannounced, allowing a movement of up to ± 0.3% within any given day. Although this step was originally accepted at face value in public policy circles, scepticism is in order. The second econometric part of the paper evaluates what exchange rate regime China has actually been following. We use the technique introduced byFrankel and Wei (1994)): one regresses changes in the value of the local currency, in this case the RMB, against changes in the values of the dollar, euro, yen and other currencies that may be in the basket. We find that within 2005, the de facto regime remained a peg to a basket that put virtually all weight on the dollar. Subsequently there has been a modest but steady increase in flexibility with some weight shifted to a few non-dollar currencies – but not those one might expect. In any case, the weight on the dollar was still fairly heavy in 2006. The paper tests whether the decline in the implicit weight on the dollar is related to the pressure from US officials. It also considers whether the increase in flexibility that we have seen, small though it is, has been gradually accelerating, at a rate that would suggest the likelihood of some genuine flexibility in the not-so-distant future.

— Jeffrey A. Frankel and Shang-Jin Wei

Journal Article.  20980 words.  Illustrated.

Subjects: Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity ; Financial Regulation ; Health, Education, and Welfare ; Labour and Demographic Economics ; Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics ; Public Economics ; Regional Government Analysis

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.