Chapter

Government Moralism

Peter de Marneffe

in Liberalism and Prostitution

Published in print November 2009 | ISBN: 9780195383249
Published online February 2010 | e-ISBN: 9780199870554 | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195383249.003.0003

Series: Oxford Political Philosophy

Government Moralism

More Like This

Show all results sharing this subject:

  • Social and Political Philosophy

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

The paternalistic argument for prostitution laws does not presuppose that it is inherently wrong or immoral to exchange sex for money. Nor does it presuppose that prostitution laws could be justified on this ground if it were true. Nor does this argument imply that the government is justified in limiting our sexual freedom in other ways. Prostitution laws justified on paternalistic grounds are therefore not objectionably moralistic. Although the paternalistic argument stated in chapter 1 presupposes that prostitution is “degrading,” and although John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin have argued that the fact that a form of sexual conduct is degrading cannot justify the government in prohibiting it, the paternalistic argument for prostitution laws is nonetheless compatible with liberal principles of liberty. It is misleading to characterize U.S. prostitution laws as “morals legislation” because in U.S. history, the paternalistic justification has been more influential than any purely moralistic one.

Keywords: moralism; legislation; sexual freedom; degradation; John Rawls; Ronald Dworkin; history; U.S. prostitution law

Chapter.  9820 words. 

Subjects: Social and Political Philosophy

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.