Samuel A. Chambers

in The Lessons of Rancière

Published in print October 2012 | ISBN: 9780199927210
Published online January 2013 | e-ISBN: 9780199980529 | DOI:

Show Summary Details


This chapter centers on the role of language in an understanding of democratic politics. It focuses on a reinterpretation of Rancière's critical reading of Aristotle. Aristotle claims that we can distinguish the human animal from all others because the former possesses speech (logos) while the latter has only voice (phone), and it is, for Aristotle, exactly the possession of logos that makes the human animal a political animal. Rancière agrees, but also disagrees: he shows that the phone/logos cannot simply determine what is political, since the distinction itself can only be drawn politically. The chapter makes the case for a radically important non-anthropocentric understanding of language in Rancière. Along the way, this chapter also shows that Rancière's most important text in English translation, Disagreement, has actually been significantly mistranslated in its opening lines—at just the point that Rancière offers his crucial interpretation of Aristotle.

Keywords: discursive; literarity; language; translation; Aristotle; anthropocentrism

Chapter.  17324 words. 

Subjects: Political Theory

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Buy this work at Oxford University Press »

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.