Journal Article

Lateral Flow Immunoassays for Ebola Virus Disease Detection in Liberia

Jill C. Phan, James Pettitt, Josiah S. George, Lawrence S. Fakoli, Fahn M. Taweh, Stacey L. Bateman, Richard S. Bennett, Sarah L. Norris, David A. Spinnler, Guillermo Pimentel, Phillip K. Sahr, Fatorma K. Bolay and Randal J. Schoepp

in The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Published on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America

Volume 214, issue suppl_3, pages S222-S228
Published in print October 2016 | ISSN: 0022-1899
Published online October 2016 | e-ISSN: 1537-6613 | DOI:
Lateral Flow Immunoassays for Ebola Virus Disease Detection in Liberia

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Immunology
  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Microbiology


Show Summary Details


Background. Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIs) are point-of-care diagnostic assays that are designed for single use outside a formal laboratory, with in-home pregnancy tests the best-known example of these tests. Although the LFI has some limitations over more-complex immunoassay procedures, such as reduced sensitivity and the potential for false-positive results when using complex sample matrices, the assay has the benefits of a rapid time to result and ease of use. These benefits make it an attractive option for obtaining rapid results in an austere environment. In an outbreak of any magnitude, a field-based rapid diagnostic assay would allow proper patient transport and for safe burials to be conducted without the delay caused by transport of samples between remote villages and testing facilities. Use of such point-of-care instruments in the ongoing Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa would have distinct advantages in control and prevention of local outbreaks, but proper understanding of the technology and interpretation of results are important.

Methods. In this study, a LFI, originally developed by the Naval Medical Research Center for Ebola virus environmental testing, was evaluated for its ability to detect the virus in clinical samples in Liberia. Clinical blood and plasma samples and post mortem oral swabs submitted to the Liberian Institute for Biomedical Research, the National Public Health Reference Laboratory for EVD testing, were tested and compared to results of real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), using assays targeting Ebola virus glycoprotein and nucleoprotein.

Results. The LFI findings correlated well with those of the real-time RT-PCR assays used as benchmarks.

Conclusions. Rapid antigen-detection tests such as LFIs are attractive alternatives to traditional immunoassays but have reduced sensitivity and specificity, resulting in increases in false-positive and false-negative results. An understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of a particular assay lets the diagnostician choose the correct situation to use the correct assay and properly interpret the results.

Keywords: Ebola; EBOV; Ebola virus disease; EVD; diagnostics; lateral flow; immunoassay; LFI; antibodies; Liberia; West Africa

Journal Article.  5496 words. 

Subjects: Infectious Diseases ; Immunology ; Public Health and Epidemiology ; Microbiology

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.