Journal Article

Seeking Baselines for Negative Authority: Constitutional and Rule-of-law Arguments Over Nonenforcement and Waiver

Zachary S. Price

in Journal of Legal Analysis

Volume 8, issue 1, pages 235-276
Published in print June 2016 | ISSN: 2161-7201
Published online May 2016 | e-ISSN: 1946-5319 | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jla/law005

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
  • Economics

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Recent controversies have called attention to the potential significance of negative executive authority—the authority to limit or undo what Congress has done through nonenforcement or waiver. This symposium essay reflects in several ways on constitutional and rule-of-law debates that have emerged regarding such authority. First, it defends the relevance of constitutional principles to baseline understandings of nonenforcement authority. Second, it identifies a deep tension in the rule of law’s implications for discretionary enforcement. Third, it defends statutorily conferred law-cancellation authority against constitutional challenges and rule-of-law objections. Finally, it proposes presumptive limits on authority to condition statutory waivers.

Journal Article.  17586 words. 

Subjects: Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law ; Economics

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or login to access all content.