Journal Article

Recall and Effectiveness of Messages Promoting Smoke-Free Policies in Rural Communities

Mary Kay Rayens, Karen M. Butler, Amanda T. Wiggins, Ganna Kostygina, Ronald E. Langley and Ellen J. Hahn

in Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volume 18, issue 5, pages 1340-1347
Published in print May 2016 | ISSN: 1462-2203
Published online September 2015 | e-ISSN: 1469-994X | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv197
Recall and Effectiveness of Messages Promoting Smoke-Free Policies in Rural Communities

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

  • Public Health and Epidemiology
  • Addictions and Substance Misuse

GO

Show Summary Details

Preview

Introduction:

Low-cost media campaigns increase demand for smoke-free policies in underserved rural areas. The study examined the impact of loss- and gain-framed smoke-free print ads on recall and perceived effectiveness in rural communities, controlling for personal characteristics.

Methods:

Following 6- to 9-month print media campaigns in three rural counties, recall and perceived effectiveness of loss-framed (ie, targeting dangers of secondhand smoke [SHS]) and gain-framed (ie, highlighting positive aspects of smoke-free air) ads were assessed using random-digit-dial phone surveys. Respondents were asked if they remembered each ad, whether they liked it, whether they were prompted to contact a smoke-free coalition, whether the ad made them think, and whether it prompted emotion. Mixed modeling assessed whether personal factors predicted ad recall or perceived effectiveness.

Results:

Loss-framed ads were less likely to be recalled but more likely to prompt emotion. For ads of both frame types, females reported greater recall and perceived effectiveness than males. Those with less education reported higher perceived effectiveness of the ads but lower recall. Nonsmokers were more likely than smokers to perceive the ads as effective. Knowledge of SHS risk and support for smoke-free workplaces were positively associated with recall and effectiveness.

Conclusions:

Ad recall and perceived effectiveness were associated with framing and demographic and personal characteristics. Smoke-free efforts in rural areas may be bolstered by continuing to promote benefits of smoke-free workplace policies and educate on SHS risks. Rural areas may need to provide a combination of ad types and framing strategies to appeal to a wide audience.

Implications:

Rural communities are disproportionately affected by SHS and less likely to be protected by smoke-free policies. This study adds evidence-based guidance for tailoring rural smoke-free media campaigns using different framing: gain-framed messages (ie, benefits of smoke-free environments) to promote recall and loss-framed content (ie, dangers of SHS) to prompt emotion. Further, gain-framed messages that are localized to the rural community may be especially effective. Findings support designing smoke-free campaigns in rural communities with the audience in mind by tailoring messages to age, sex, and education level.

Journal Article.  6160 words. 

Subjects: Public Health and Epidemiology ; Addictions and Substance Misuse

Full text: subscription required

How to subscribe Recommend to my Librarian

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content. subscribe or purchase to access all content.